Plagtracker Review (Score: 4 out of 6)

Verdict:  In tests, the scanner detected plagiarism in four out of six sample documents – higher than the average, but still only as good as some of the free checkers also tested.

Service:   www.plagtracker.com/

What are the subscription options? e.g. free, paid only, paid and freeIf paid options, what length of subscription/price structure is offered?Online checker may be used without a subscription but all reports after the first will be delayed. Premium subscription costs $7.49.
Maximum word count? (if any)Unlimited/ not specified.
Resubmissions allowed? If so, is this limited?Unlimited checks.
Type of scanner E.g. software download, copy and paste, upload document online.  Say if multiple options are offered.Two options offered: “Copy and paste’ online scanner;File uploader.
Sources checked E.g. internet, any specific journal databases mentioned, any electronic book databases such as Google docs mentioned, past submissions from other students etcWebsite – no words altered; Website – some words removed; Website – some words changed; Website – fully paraphrased; Online pdf; Electronic book.
File types supported E.g. doc, docx, rtf, open office, pdfs, pptsSupported file types include .DOC, .DOCX, .RTF & .TXT on the Premium version.
Extra features? E.g. grammar checker, spelling checkerNone.
Support offered? E.g. phone, email etcThere is an FAQ and a “contact us” link where users can submit an online query.
Report  / results
Type of report Downloadable? Shareable?Reports are generated within the browser and these may be downloaded and shared.
Side by side comparison to plagiarism?No.
Accuracy of results – Which sections were detected and which were not (make sure the correct source is identified)
Basic plagiarism – copied and pasted from a website sourceDetected. The online scanner correctly identified the webpage which contained material that had been plagiarised.
Basic plagiarism – copied and pasted from an online pdfDetected. The online scanner correctly identified the online pdf which contained material that had been plagiarised.
Some words removed – copied and pasted from a website sourceDetected. The online scanner correctly identified the webpage which contained material that had been plagiarised.
Some words changed – copied and pasted from a website sourceNot detected. The online scanner did not identify the website which contained material that had been plagiarised.
Full paraphrasing – copied and pasted from a website sourceNot detected. The online scanner did not identify the website which contained material that had been plagiarised.
Basic plagiarism – copied and pasted from an electronic bookDetected. The online scanner correctly identified the electronic book which contained material that had been plagiarised.
General observations Ease of use, overall experience.  If other features were included (e.g. spelling, grammar check), how easy were they to use and how useful were they?
The PlagTracker website is one of those which raises suspicions the moment it loads. Even though “free” and “absolutely free” appear in its banner, there’s something about its professional design which tells you that there’s going to be some sort of cost involved. It also claims to be “the most accurate plagiarism checking service”, although no evidence for this is forthcoming. Its testimonials are, predictably, wholly positive and, again, a lot of it just doesn’t ring true.The plagiarism scanner which features on PlagTracker is professional in looks and tone and is easy to use. Down the right hand side of the scanner it reports how many other papers have been checked today, the average percentage of plagiarism and the number of positive feedback comments from customers – no matter what time of the day or night you log in, the number of papers “checked today” is always in its thousands. Documents can either be pasted into the scanner or uploaded and the checking process takes upwards of a minute. However, after one scan, free users have to wait for their report which is emailed to them later in the day.In tests, the scanner detected plagiarism in four out of six sample documents – higher than the average, but still only as good as some of the free checkers also tested. It detected blanket plagiarism and plagiarism where some of the words had been removed. It also spotted a plagiarised pdf and electronic book. It did not detect plagiarism in work where some of the words had been changed, nor did it spot an entirely paraphrased work.

The word “awesome’ features a lot on PlagTracker. When it doesn’t detect that work has been plagiarised, it dubs it “awesome” and urges the user to share it… Likewise, every time a scan has completed, a feedback box pops up, “you have an awesome chance improve our service…”  At least it doesn’t describe everything as epic.Like the other plagiarism scanners which offer free scans, it’s worth using PlagTracker’s free checker and a few other scanners if you want to detect plagiarism, but probably not worth the $7.49 for premium membership unless you really can’t wait to get your report.

For a current alternative, PlagPointer’s plagiarism checker combines plagiarism and AI detection in the same document scan.

PlagPointer · Plagiarism + AI detection

Highly accurate
plagiarism & AI detection.

Detect copied text, paraphrasing and AI-generated writing in a single scan.

From 18p per 250 words

Both checks included. No subscription. Credits never expire.

  • Over 99% AI detection accuracyA highly accurate detection engine with a low false-positive rate in provider testing.
  • Search 60 trillion web sourcesCheck for copied and paraphrased text, with 16,000+ open-access journals covered too.
  • Detailed, downloadable reportsSee matching sources and AI findings in a clear PDF report, saved to your account.
  • Your work stays privateNo notifications to your university or employer. No shared database uploads by default.

*Choose plagiarism detection, AI detection, or both for the same price. AI detection requires at least 350 words.

Leave a Comment

Find us on: